【作者简介】
向燕，中国社会科学院法学研究所博士后研究人员。
【注释】《加拿大权利与自由宪章》是加拿大
宪法中的权利法案。它构成加拿大《1982年
宪法法案》的第一部分。《宪章》保障人民的政治权利和公民权利不受政府行为的非法侵犯。
美国宪法第4修正案规定:“人民的人身、住宅、文件和财产安全不受不合理搜查扣押的权利,不得侵犯,除非基于合理根据,以宣誓或代誓宣言保证,并记载特定的搜查地点和扣押的人或物,不得签发令状。”
Katz v. U. S., 389 U. S. 347 (1967).
Hunter v. Southam, (1984)2 S.C.R. 145, atpara 25.
R. v. Dyment, (1988)2 S.C.R. 417 atpara. 28.
Katz v. U. S., 389 U. S. 347, 361 (1967).
R v. Evans, (1996)1 S.C.R. 8, atpara 45.
R. v. Edwards, (1996)1 S.C.R. 128.
425 U. S. 435 (1976).
442 U. S. 735(1979).
R. v. Duarte, (1990)1 S.C.R. 30, (sub nom. R. v. Sanelli) , at48(S.C.C. ).
R. v. Duarte, (1990)1 S.C.R. 30, (sub nom. R. v. Sanelli), at43-44(S.C.C. ).
R. v. Wong, (1990)3 S.C.R. 36, atpara 16.
R. v. Wong, (1990)3 S.C.R. 36, atpara 14-15.
R. v. Wong, (1990)3 S.C.R. 36, atpara 13.
R v. Dymen, (1988)2 S.C.R. 417, atpara 39.
R v. Dymen, (1988)2 S.C.R. 417, atpara 39.
R v. Mills, (1999)3 S.C.R. 668, atpara 108.
460 U. S. 276 (1983).
R v. W ise, (1992)1 S.C.R. 527.
462 U. S. 696(1983).
R. v. M. (A. ), (2008)1 S.C.R. 569, para 69-74.
R. v. M. (A. ), (2008)1 S.C.R. 569, para 74.
R. v. W ise, (1992)1 S.C.R. 527, atpara 13.
R v. Wong, (1990)3 S.C.R. 36, at46.
R. v. Dyment, (1988)2 S.C.R. 417 atpara. 28, R. v. Plant, (1993)3 S.C.R. 281, at27.
R. v. Plant, (1993)3 S.C.R. 281, at27.
R. v. Mills, (1999)3 S.C.R. 668, atpara 79.
R. v. Mills, (1999)3 S.C.R. 668, atpara 80.
R. v. Mills, (1999)3 S.C.R. 668, atpara 81.
R. v. Mills, (1999)3 S.C.R. 668, atpara 82.
R v. Edwards, (1996)1 S.C.R. 128, atpara 68.
Canadian Charter ofRights and Freedoms,available at http: //www. pch. gc. ca/progs/pdp-hrp/canada/guide/enforcement_e. cfm, 2008年10月27日访问。
R. v. Collins, (1987)1 S.C.R. 265, R. v. Simmons, (1988)2 S.C.R. 495.
R. v. Wong, (1990)3 S.C.R. 36, 62 (S.C.C. ), atpara 39.
R. v. Collins, (1987)1 S.C.R. 265, R. v. Simmons, (1988)2 S.C.R. 495.
参见R. v. Plant, (1993)3 S.C.R. 281。
