法搜网--中国法律信息搜索网
法律信息 | 法律新闻 | 案例 | 精品文章 | 刑事法律 | 民事法律 | 经济法律 | 行政法律 | 诉讼法律 | 合  同 | 案例精选 | 法律文书 | 合同范本 | 法律常识 | 司考题库 | 
法律图书 | 诉讼指南 | 常用法规 | 法律实务 | 法律释义 | 法律问答 | 法规解读 | 裁判文书 | 宪法类 | 民商法类 | 行政法类 | 经济法类 | 刑法类 | 社会法类 | 案例趋势 |     
Legal Risks Arising from the U.S. PCAOB’s Inspection on Foreign Accounting Firms: The Chinese Perspective

  
  IV.  Possible solutions

  
  In light of the above legal risks, the author suggests that Chinese companies listed in the U.S. and appropriate accounting firms should consider taking the following measures:

  
  1. Chinese companies listed in the U.S. and appropriate accounting firms should strengthen confidentiality and archives management. In order to perform the Chinese statutory obligation of guarding state secrets and archives, Chinese companies listed in the U.S. and appropriate accounting firms should establish or improve the appropriate internal rules, providing specifically for the scope of confidentiality of documents and information, the responsibilities of the confidentiality staff, confidentiality control measures, and the collection, preservation and utilisation of archives, etc., and carrying out all control measures, so as to establish a long-acting compliance mechanism pursuant to the Law on Guarding State Secrets, the Archives Law and other applicable laws and regulations, based on its practical business operations.

  
  2. Chinese companies listed in the U.S. should identify accounting information involving sensitive information, and take different approaches to different types of accounting information. Based on the principle “who generates, who classifies”, Chinese companies listed in the U.S. should determine pursuant to law if any accounting information generated in routine operations involves state secrets, and the corresponding level and scope of confidentiality.

  
  If it is difficult to determine if certain sensitive information is state secret, a Chinese company listed in the U.S. should submit such information in a timely fashion to the state secret-guarding authorities for identification. A Chinese company listed in the U.S. should not provide any accounting information determined or identified to involve state secrets pursuant to law to an appropriate accounting firm; if the non-disclosure of the above accounting information might limit the scope of auditing, the Chinese company listed in the U.S. should not provide such information to the appropriate accounting firm without the prior approval of the state secret-guarding authorities, provided it takes non-disclosure measures and asks the other party to assume the non-disclosure commitments;


第 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] 页 共[9]页
上面法规内容为部分内容,如果要查看全文请点击此处:查看全文
【发表评论】 【互动社区】
 
相关文章




法律信息 | 法律新闻 | 案例 | 精品文章 | 刑事法律 | 民事法律 | 经济法律 | 行政法律 | 诉讼法律 | 合同 | 案例精选 | 法律文书 | 合同范本 | 法律常识 | 
法律图书 | 诉讼指南 | 常用法规 | 法律实务 | 法律释义 | 法律问答 | 法规解读 | 裁判文书 | 宪法类 | 民商法类 | 行政法类 | 经济法类 | 刑法类 | 社会法类 |