第×条如果受违法行为影响的人能够证明目前的基于全部争议金额支付诉讼费用非常困难，法院有权根据其实际经济状况对诉讼费用进行调整，决定按部分争议金额支付法院的诉讼费用。
【说明】按照我国法律的规定，原告在起诉时应该预先支付诉讼费用。如果胜诉，则可以由被告承担。一旦败诉，原告将承担一切诉讼费用，包括专家证人费用，在部分案件中还要承担被告的律师费和调查费。如果没有完全胜诉，则诉讼费用按一定比例分配。这种诉讼费用的支付方式对于那些受限制竞争行为影响的小公司和个人而言存在着极大的风险，可能成为私人执行的主要障碍。为了降低这种障碍，我们建议借鉴德国的“法院酌定诉讼费制度”。
【作者简介】
王健，浙江理工大学法政学院副教授，法学博士。
【注释】GREEN PAPER - Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules〔EB /OL〕， http：// europa. eu. int/comm/competition/antitrust/others/actions_for_damages/gp_en. pdf，2006-05-08.6.
Warren F. Schwartz，Private Enforcement of the Antitrust Laws：An Economic Critique， American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research，1981.31.
Clifford A. Jones， Exporting Antitrust Courtrooms to the World： Private Enforcement in a Global Market， 16 Loyola Consumer Law Review 2004.411.
王健：《威慑理念下的
反垄断法刑事制裁制度》，载《法商研究》2006年第1期。
陈志民：《吓阻概念下之
反垄断法私人诉讼》，载《人文及社会科学集刊》第14卷， (1)。
Karen Yeung，Privatizing Competition Regulation， Oxford Journal of Legal Studies， Vol. 18， 1998. 588–589.
Clifford A. Jones， Exporting Antitrust Courtrooms to the World： Private Enforcement in a Global Market， 16 Loyola Consumer Law Review 2004.423–424.
Uif Boge and Konrad Ost，Up and Running， or is it? Private enforcement-the Situation in Germany and Policy Perspectives，E. C. L. R. 2006，27 (4).197
C. J Michael Flavell and Christopher J. Kent， the Canadian Competition Law Handbook， Carswell Publishing， 1997.196.
Matthew C. Stephenson， Public Regulation of Private Enforcement：The Case for Expanding the Role of Administrative Agencies，91 Va. L. Rev. 2005.108–109.
Matthew C. Stephenson， Public Regulation of Private Enforcement：The Case for Expanding the Role of Administrative Agencies，91 Va. L. Rev. 2005.110.
Matthew C. Stephenson， Public Regulation of Private Enforcement：The Case for Expanding the Role of Administrative Agencies，91 Va. L. Rev. 2005.108–109.
Matthew C. Stephenson， Public Regulation of Private Enforcement：The Case for Expanding the Role of Administrative Agencies， 91 Va. L. Rev. 2005.111.
Kent Roach and Michael J. Trebilcock， Private Enforcement of Competition Laws， Osgoode Hall Law Journal，Vol. 34， 1996.481–482.
Karen Yeung，Privatizing Competition Regulation， Oxford Journal of Legal Studies， Vol. 18，1998. 590.
Paul S. Ferber， Antitrust Symposium：The Effectiveness of The Private Treble Damages Action as an Antitrust Enforcement Mechanism， 8 Sw. U. L. Rev. 1976.507.
Matthew C. Stephenson，Public Regulation of Private Enforcement： The Case for Expanding the Role of Administrative Agencies， 91 Va. L. Rev. 2005.109.
R. PrestonMcAfee， HugoM. Mialon， and Sue H. Mialon， Private v. Public Antitrust Enforcement： A strategic Analysis〔EB /OL〕，http：//www. economics. emory. edu /Working_Papers/wp /mialon_05_23_paper. pdf， 2006-07-21.
Kent Roach and Michael J. Trebilcock， Private Enforcement of Competition Laws，Osgoode Hall Law Journal，Vol. 34， 1996.481.
International Competition Network Cartels Working Group， Interaction of Public and Private Enforcement in Cartel Cases〔EB /OL〕. http：//www. international competition network. org/ capetown2006 / ICN-private-enforcement-final-version. pdf， 2006-07–32.
R. Jack Roberts， International Comparative Analysis of Private Rights of Access， A Study Commissioned by Industry Canada &Competition Bureau.151.
Harry First， Antitrust Enforcement in Japan， 64 Antitrust L. J. 1995-1996.180.
Maureen Brunt， The Role of Private Actions in Australian Restrictive Trade Practices Enforcement， Melbourne University Law Review， Vol. 17， December 1990.582.
Kent Roach and Michael J. Trebilcock， Private Enforcement of Competition Laws， Osgoode Hall Law Journal， Vol. 34， 1996.467.
与此同时，美国反托拉斯法的私人执行也暴露了一些问题，其在实践中的应用有一定的局限性，需要采取进一步措施加以克服。有关这方面的内容作者将在另一篇文章中阐述。
Francisco Marcos， The Enforcement of Spanish Antitrust Law： A Critical Assessment of the Fines Setting Policy and of the Legal Framework for Private Enforcement Actions. 〔EB /OL 〕http：//www. cms. uva. nl/acle/object. cfm/objectid = FA90BCFC-0081-424E-9E8288B37099B52B /download = true， 2006- 11–13.
Donncadh Woods， The Growth of Private Rights of Action Outside the U. S. ： Private Enforcement of Antitrust Rules- Modernization of the EU Rules and the Road Ahead， 16 Loy. Consumer L. Rev. 2004.437.
Georg Berrisch， Eve Jordan and Rocio Salvador Roldan， E. U. Competition and Private Actions for Damages， 24 NW. J. INT’L L. &BUS. 2004.596.
Clifford A. Jones， Exporting Antitrust Courtrooms to the World： Private Enforcement in a Global Market， 16 Loyola Consumer Law Review 2004.427.
David Rosenberg & James P. Sullivan， Coordinating Private Class Action and Public Agency Enforcement of Antitrust Law，Journal of Competition Law and Economics， 2006： 168.
Clifford A. Jones and Mitsuo Matsushita， Competition Policy in the Global Trading System， Kluwer Law International 2002.213.
Michael Tebilcock， Ralph A. Winter， Paul Collins， Edward M. Iacobucci， The Law and Economics of Canadian Competition Policy， University of Toronto Press， 2002.772.
International Competition Network Cartels Working Group， Interaction of Public and Private Enforcement in Cartel Cases〔EB /OL〕. http：//www. international competition network. org/capetown2006/ICN-private-enforcement-final-version. pdf，2006-07–8.
Janet L. McDavid and Howard Weber， E. U. Private Actions， The National Law Journal， Ap ril 25， 2005.
John H. Beisner and Charles E. Borden， Expanding Private Causes of Action： Lessons from the U. S. Litigation Experience〔EB /OL〕， http：//www. institute for legalre form. com /resources/Expanding Private Causes of Action F INAL. doc， 2006-05–15.
《执法机构地位明晰乃
反垄断法关键》〔EB/OL〕，来源于：http：// finance. sina. com. cn/review /20060625/11162678997. shtml， 2006-07-10.
蔡从燕：《论私人反垄断诉讼——法实现机制中私人的作用及保障》，载梁慧星主编：《民商法论丛(第29卷)》，法律出版社2004年版，第271页。
郑鹏程：《美国反垄断法三倍损害赔偿制度研究》，载《环球法律评论》2005年第6期，第172页。
Uif Boge and Konrad Ost， Up and Running， or is it? Private enforcement-the Situation in Germany and Policy Perspectives，E. C. L. R. 2006，27 (4).199–200.
