论我国民事被告答辩制度的缺陷与改进
On the Improvement In the Plea System of Our Country
刘加良
【摘要】The plea system of our country in existence leaves principle of equality in civil proceeding alone and lets it lack in principal character, make adversary doctrine in civil proceeding exist in name only and yet brings forth more resistance to possible reform in future, decreases the anticipation for litigant profit of subject of action and the appetency of action for disputes solving and counteracts the exertion of the normative directive function of civil procedural law. In the context of the modification of civil procedural law and the modernization of civil action, the faults of the plea system in China can be found objectively. Its improvement in period、pattern、content and legal result should lay the base of the history and the present facts of our country and learn something better from foreign relating systems .
【关键词】the plea system; faults; improvement
【全文】
民事被告答辩制度是指现有的民事诉讼法律渊源中有关民事被告答辩的期限、形式、内容和法律后果等一系列法律规范的总称，主要体现为《
民事诉讼法》第
113条、第
143条及第
248条的规定和《
最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》第
8条、第
32条及第
81条的规定。在修改
民事诉讼法、实现民事诉讼现代化的现实语境中，我国民事被告答辩制度的缺陷客观存在，需要克服。本文试图以更为系统的视角审视这一制度的改进，以期促进对民事被告答辩制度的更多关注。
