法搜网--中国法律信息搜索网
选举公正的司法保障——论负面竞选的审查标准(四)

【参考文献】Cynthia Anderson-Barker, Election Fraud in Mexico: A Case Study of Elections in the State of Michoacan on July 12, 1992, 16 Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review 307 (1994). 
   
  Developments in the Law: Elections: VI. Postelection Remedies, 88 Harvard Law Review 1298. 
   
  Developments in the Law: Voting and Democracy, 119 Harvard Law Review 1188 (2006). 
   
  A.V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (8th Ed.), London: Macmillan (1915). 
   
  Anthony Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper-Collins (1957). 
   
  Robert Brett Dunham, Defoliating the Grassroots: Election Day Restrictions on Political Speech, 77 Georgetown Law Journal 2137 (1989). 
   
  John Hart Ely, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (New Ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (2006). 
   
  Cleveland Ferguson III, The Politics of Ethics and Elections: Can Negative Campaign Advertising Be Regulated in Florida? 24 Florida State University Law Review 463 (1997). 
   
  James A. Gardner, Protecting The Rationality of Electoral Outcomes: A Challenge to First Amendment Doctrine, 51 University of Chicago Law Review 892 (1984). 
   
  Rachel J. Grabow, McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission: Protecting the Freedom of Speech or Damaging the Electoral Process? 46 Catholic University Law Review 565 (1997). 
   
  Richard L. Hasen, Beyond the Margin of Litigation: Reforming U.S. Election Administration To Avoid Electoral Meltdown, 62 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 937 (2005). 
   
  Melvin Hinich and Michael Munger, Analytical Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press (1996). 
   
  Thomas Kane, Malice, Lies, and Videotape: Revisiting New York Times v. Sullivan in the Modern Age of Political Campaigns, 30 Rutgers Law Journal 755 (1999). 
   
  Wendy J. Keefer, Contesting Election Results in South Carolina, 12 South Carolina Lawyer 22 (2000). 
   
  Robert L. Kerr, From Sullivan to Nike: Will the Noble purpose of the Landmark Free Speech Case Be Subverted to Immunize False Advertising? 9 Communication Law and Policy 525 (2004). 
   
  Donald Kommers, The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, Durham, NC: Duke University Press (1989). 


第 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] 页 共[9]页
上面法规内容为部分内容,如果要查看全文请点击此处:查看全文
【发表评论】 【互动社区】
 
相关文章