|
相关争论，参见Soren J. Schonberg, Legitimate Expectations in Administrative Law, Oxford University Press,2000.pp.109-114.
Associated Picture House Ltd. v. Wednesbury Corporation 1 KB 223.
Council of Civil Service Union v. Minister for the Civil ServiceAC 374.
CCSU v. Minister for the Civil ServiceAC 374,410.
R v. Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex p UnileverSTC.681,695.
参见，R v. Home secretary, ex p UrmazaCOD 479.
P. Craig, Administrative Law(4th Ed.1999)537-539.
R v. Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Richmond upon Thames London BC 1 W.L.R.74.
R v. Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte Hamble Fisheries Ltd2 All.E.R.714. HF为一家渔业公司，自1987年起，因信赖农渔部允许渔船间受管制鱼种捕捞执照可以移转、合并的政策，先后投资购买一艘大型拖网渔船与两艘已经取得执照的小渔船，准备将小渔船的执照移转到大渔船上。结果，1992年，农渔部为了减少捕鱼量，宣布停止受理执照移转与合并申请。HF主张农渔部的政策改变侵害其因信赖原政策所既得之利益，且没有订立过渡条款等起诉至法院。
Unilever, above note22.原告向税务机关申请某年度营业损失的减免税，税务机关以超过两年申请期限为由拒绝，原告认为在税务机关过去的实践中两年期限一直没有完全贯彻执行，其相信这一次也不适用，因此起诉至法院。
R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hargreavs 1 All.E.R.397.此案涉及短期服刑人员，在入狱时，他们被告知只要表现良好，在服刑满三分之一期限时，经特许可申请返家探视。后来由于探亲假期间在外犯罪情形增加，内政部改变了原来的政策，将服刑满三分之一提高至二分之一，原告以正当期待利益受其侵害为由，提起诉讼。
P. Craig and Soren Schonberg, Substantive Legitimate Expectations after Coughlan, PL 684, 689-690.
M. Elliott, Coughlan: Substantive Protection of Legitimate Expectations Revisited, JR 27, 29-30.
Craig and Schonberg, above note29, pp.694-695.
R. v. Secretary of State for Education and Employment, ex parte Begbie W.L.R.1115.
|
