|
Steve Coffman, Special Considerations forFee-Based Services in Public Libraries, 同注3.
Ryan v. CarlCorp., 1998 U.S. Dist. 23 F. Supp. 2d 1146 (N. D. Cal. 1998); LEXIS 9012.该案原告(作者)以被告出版商Carl等公司在未预先获得其许可的情况下复制并出售其文章为由向加州北区联邦地区法院提出诉讼，法庭以原告作品尚未获得版权登记、不得提起侵权之诉为由驳回起诉。
Association of American Publishers, at (查询于2005-12-28)
Statement of the Association of American Publishers (AAP) onDocument Delivery, at (查询于2005-12-28)
APP Position Paper on Scanning, at (查询于2006-01-01)
17 USC Sec. 108, at (查询于2006-01-01)
同上注
CONTU Guidelines on Photocopying under Interlibrary LoanArrangements, (查询于2006-01-05).
Folsom v.Marsh, 9 F.Cas. 342, 6 Hunt Mer. Mag. 175, 2 Story 100, No. 4901, Case No.4,901, 2 Story, 100; 6 Hunt, Mer. Mag. 175, (查询于2006-01-05).
In short, we must often, in deciding questionsof this sort, look to the nature and objects of the selections made, thequantity and value of the materials used, and the degree in which the use mayprejudice the sale, or diminish the profits, or supersede the objects, of theoriginal work. 同上注.
17 USC Sec. 107, at (查询于2006-01-05).
同上注.
Marcus v. Rowley, 695 F. 2d 1171 (9th Cir. 1983); LEXIS 27822.
Campbell v.Acuff-Rose Music, 510 U. S. 569(U. S. 1994); LEXIS 2052. 该案件中文介绍参见广西知识产权审判网著作权栏目中的案例研究部分， (查询于2006-01-05)
Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539 (U.S. 1985); 1985 U.S. LEXIS 17.
同注9.
同注9.
Isolated,spontaneous making of single photocopies by a library in a for-profitorganization, without any systematic effort to substitute photocopying forsubscriptions or purchases, would be covered by section 108, even though the copiesare furnished to the employees of the organization for use in their work. Similarly, for-profit libraries couldparticipate in interlibrary arrangements for exchange of photocopies, as longas the reproduction or distribution was not “systematic.”——H.R. Rep. No. 94-1476, 94th Cong., 2d Sess., September 3,1976. Reproduction of Copyrighted Works by Educators andLibrarians, p15, at (查询于2006-01-11)
|
