法搜网--中国法律信息搜索网
娉曞緥淇℃伅 | 娉曞緥鏂伴椈 | 妗堜緥 | 绮惧搧鏂囩珷 | 鍒戜簨娉曞緥 | 姘戜簨娉曞緥 | 缁忔祹娉曞緥 | 琛屾斂娉曞緥 | 璇夎娉曞緥 | 鍚堛€€銆€鍚� | 妗堜緥绮鹃€� | 娉曞緥鏂囦功 | 鍚堝悓鑼冩湰 | 娉曞緥甯歌瘑 | 鍙歌€冮搴� | 
娉曞緥鍥句功 | 璇夎鎸囧崡 | 甯哥敤娉曡 | 娉曞緥瀹炲姟 | 娉曞緥閲婁箟 | 娉曞緥闂瓟 | 娉曡瑙h | 瑁佸垽鏂囦功 | 瀹硶绫� | 姘戝晢娉曠被 | 琛屾斂娉曠被 | 缁忔祹娉曠被 | 鍒戞硶绫� | 绀句細娉曠被 | 妗堜緥瓒嬪娍 | 銆€銆€銆€銆€
为什么CIF合同不是文件买卖合同

  3. The fact that that documents can be tendered as normal for the full purchase price when goods are lost further results in the strengthening of the position of the documents in a CIF contract.
  This strong point would appear to be a little unfair to the buyer who in reality would not just want to buy a pile of papers instead of goods under the CIF contract. However, those who argue for the importance of documents claim support for this viewpoint from the statement made by Donaldson J in M Golodetz & Co Ltd v Czarnikow-Rionda Inc (The Galatia)8 that the fact that the ship and the goods have been lost after shipment or that a liability to contribute in general average or salvage has arisen is no reason for refusing to accept and pay for the documents. It is further stated in some cases that it is irrelevant even though both buyer and seller knew of the loss of the ship before the latter tendered the documents. Indeed, from the judgments of both Manbre Saccharin Co v Corn Product Co 9and Groom (C) Ltd v Barber10, it has been confirmed that in the case of loss the buyer will receive not the goods but the documents for which he bargained. It may happen that goods are lost or damaged in transit and the buyer for some reason is not in a position to make a claim against the carrier or the underwriters. Nevertheless, though it may seem inequitable the seller may still tender the proper documents and expect payment and if the buyer has already paid the purchase price he is in no position to demand its return. Thus, a seller under a CIF contract for the sale of goods who has shipped the appropriate goods under a proper contract of carriage and obtained the proper documents, can effectively tender those documents to the purchaser notwithstanding that he knows at the time of such tender of the loss of the goods.
  These opinions seem to put forward that tendering and accepting documents are the essential goal of a CIF contract, even though the buyer who wants to buy goods could also be satisfied by offering the right to claim compensation from insurance policy or carrier. If the buyer is reluctant to pursue this right,, he can easily transfer the right of claiming compensation to the sub-buyer in the name of sale of goods. However unbelievable it is, the conclusion could be drawn that a CIF contract allows the tender of the documents to replace the tender of the goods.
  4. International trade practice also appear to substantiate the documentary character of CIF contracts.


第 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] 页 共[9]页
上面法规内容为部分内容,如果要查看全文请点击此处:查看全文
【发表评论】 【互动社区】
 
相关文章




娉曞緥淇℃伅 | 娉曞緥鏂伴椈 | 妗堜緥 | 绮惧搧鏂囩珷 | 鍒戜簨娉曞緥 | 姘戜簨娉曞緥 | 缁忔祹娉曞緥 | 琛屾斂娉曞緥 | 璇夎娉曞緥 | 鍚堝悓 | 妗堜緥绮鹃€� | 娉曞緥鏂囦功 | 鍚堝悓鑼冩湰 | 娉曞緥甯歌瘑 | 
娉曞緥鍥句功 | 璇夎鎸囧崡 | 甯哥敤娉曡 | 娉曞緥瀹炲姟 | 娉曞緥閲婁箟 | 娉曞緥闂瓟 | 娉曡瑙h | 瑁佸垽鏂囦功 | 瀹硶绫� | 姘戝晢娉曠被 | 琛屾斂娉曠被 | 缁忔祹娉曠被 | 鍒戞硶绫� | 绀句細娉曠被 | 銆€銆€銆€銆€